↓ Skip to main content

Quality of Life Score as a Predictor of Death in Dogs with Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of Life Score as a Predictor of Death in Dogs with Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2017
DOI 10.5935/abc.20170032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Célia M. C. Strunz, Mário Marcondes-Santos, Julio Yoshio Takada, Fernanda S. Fragata, Antônio de Pádua Mansur

Abstract

The knowledge of the variables predicting mortality is important in clinical practice and for therapeutic monitoring in mitral valve disease. To determine whether a quality of life score evaluated with the Functional Evaluation of Cardiac Health questionnaire would predict mortality in dogs with degenerative mitral valve disease (DMVD). Thirty-six client-owned dogs with mitral valve disease underwent clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic evaluations at baseline and were monitored for 6 months. Cardiovascular death was the primary outcome. The 36 dogs were classified as survivors or nonsurvivors. Higher values of the following variables were obtained at baseline in the nonsurviving group (12 dogs): amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, plasma norepinephrine, heart rate, quality of life score, diastolic left ventricular internal dimension to aortic root ratio, systolic left ventricular internal dimension to aortic root ratio, and left atrium to aortic root ratio. NT-proBNP levels and quality life score were independently associated with death in the multivariable analysis. The quality life score was an independent variable for cardiac death in dogs with DMVD. This result is encouraging, as this score is easy to apply and does not require any technology, only a veterinarian and an observant owner. O conhecimento das variáveis preditoras de mortalidade é importante para a prática clínica e para o acompanhamento terapêutico na doença da valva mitral. Determinar se um escore de qualidade de vida avaliado com o Functional Evaluation of Cardiac Health poderia auxiliar na predição de mortalidade em cães com doença degenerativa da valva mitral (DDVM). Trinta e seis cães de estimação com doença valvar mitral foram submetidos a avaliação clínica, laboratorial e ecocardiográfica no início do estudo e monitorizados durante 6 meses. A morte cardiovascular foi o desfecho primário. Os 36 cães foram classificados como sobreviventes ou não sobreviventes. Os valores mais elevados das seguintes variáveis foram obtidos no início do estudo no grupo de não sobreviventes (12 cães): fragmento N-terminal do peptídeo natriurético tipo B (NT-proBNP), norepinefrina plasmática, frequência cardíaca, escore de qualidade de vida, razão da dimensão interna diastólica do ventrículo esquerdo e raiz aórtica, razão da dimensão interna sistólica do ventrículo esquerdo e raiz aórtica e a relação da dimensão do átrio esquerdo e a raiz aórtica. Concentrações de NT-proBNP e o escore de qualidade de vida foram independentemente associados com morte na análise multivariada. O escore de qualidade de vida foi uma variável independente para a morte por doença cardíaca em cães com DDVM. Este resultado é encorajador, pois este escore é de fácil aplicação e não requer o emprego de tecnologia, necessitando apenas de um veterinário e um dono observador.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1,002
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,595
of 323,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.