↓ Skip to main content

Pre-Participation Physical Fitness does not Influence Adherence to a Supervised Exercise Program

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-Participation Physical Fitness does not Influence Adherence to a Supervised Exercise Program
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, August 2017
DOI 10.5935/abc.20170132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Akio Nishijuka, Christina Grüne de Souza e Silva, Carlos Vieira Duarte, Claudio Gil Soares de Araújo

Abstract

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation tends to reduce mortality. However, it requires medium/long-term adherence to regular physical exercise. It is relevant to identify the variables that affect adherence to an supervised exercise program (SEP). To evaluate the influence of pre-participation levels of aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness components in medium-term adherence to SEP. A total of 567 SEP participants (65 ± 12 years) (68% men) were studied. Participants adherent to the program for less than 6 months (48%) (non-adherent - NAD) were compared with 52% of participants who were adherent for 6 months or more (adherents - AD). In the non-aerobic fitness, flexibility (FLX) (Flexitest) and muscle power (MPW)/body weight in standing rowing (watts/kg) were evaluated while aerobic fitness was obtained by direct measure of VO2max/body weight (VO2). These measurements were normatized for sex and age based on percentiles (P) (P-FLX/P-MPW) of reference data or percentages of predicted (P-VO2). Additionally, AD and NAD with extreme results (tertiles) were simultaneously compared for the three variables. There was no difference between AD and NAD for non-aerobic results, in median [P25-P75], P-FLX: 30 [13-56] and 31 [9-52], respectively, (p = 0.69) and P-MPW: 34 [17-58] and 36 [16-62], respectively (p = 0.96), and for aerobic results (mean ± standard error) P-VO2 (75.9 ± 1.3% and 75.0 ± 1.3%, respectively) (p = 0.83). When comparing extreme tertiles, a difference was found for P-MPW in the lower tertile only, with a slight advantage of AD over NAD- 9 [5-16] versus 4 [1-11] (p = 0.04). Although awareness of the pre-participation levels of aerobic and non-aerobic physical fitness components is useful for individualized exercise prescription, these variables do not seem to influence medium-term adherence to SEP. Reabilitação cardíaca com ênfase em exercício tende a reduzir a mortalidade. Contudo, é necessário que haja aderência de médio/longo prazo ao exercício físico regular. Identificar variáveis influenciadoras da aderência a programas de exercício supervisionado (PES) é relevante. Avaliar a influência dos componentes da aptidão física aeróbica e não-aeróbica pré-participação na aderência de médio prazo a PES. Foram estudados 567 participantes (65 ± 12 anos) (68% homens) de um PES. Os participantes aderentes por menos de 6 meses (48%) (não-aderentes - NAD) foram comparados aos 52% dos participantes aderentes por 6 meses ou mais (aderentes - AD). Na aptidão não-aeróbica avaliou-se flexibilidade (FLX) (Flexiteste) e potência muscular (PTO)/peso corporal na remada em pé (watts/kg). Na aeróbica foi medido o consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO2 máx)/peso corporal. Essas medidas foram normalizadas para sexo e idade usando percentis (P) (P-FLX/P-PTO) de dados de referência ou percentuais do previsto (P-VO2). Adicionalmente, foram comparados AD e NAD com resultados extremos (tercis) simultaneamente para as três variáveis. Não houve diferença entre AD e NAD para os resultados não-aeróbicos, em mediana [P25-P75], de P-FLX: 30[13-56] e 31[9-52], respectivamente (p = 0,69), e P-PTO: 34[17-58] e 36[16-62] (p = 0,96), respectivamente, e para resultados aeróbicos (média ± erro padrão) P-VO2 (75,9 ± 1,3% e 75,0 ± 1,3%), respectivamente (p = 0,83). Nos extremos, houve diferença apenas para P-PTO no tercil inferior com discreta vantagem dos AD sobre NAD - 9[5-16] versus 4[1-11] (p = 0,04). Embora seja útil conhecer os níveis pré-participação dos componentes de aptidão física aeróbica e não-aeróbica para a prescrição individualizada de exercício, essas variáveis não parecem influenciar a aderência de médio prazo a PES.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unknown 15 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#733
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,150
of 327,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.