↓ Skip to main content

Atualização das Diretrizes em Cardiogeriatria da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atualização das Diretrizes em Cardiogeriatria da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2019
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, June 2019
DOI 10.5935/abc.20190086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilson Soares Feitosa, José Maria Peixoto, José Elias Soares Pinheiro, Abrahão Afiune, Afonso Luiz Tavares de Albuquerque, Álvaro César Cattani, Amit Nussbacher, Ana Amelia Camarano, Angela Hermínia Sichinels, Antonio Carlos Sobral Sousa, Aristóteles Comte de Alencar, Claudia F. Gravina, Dario Celestino Sobral, Eduardo Pitthan, Elisa Franco de Assis Costa, Elizabeth da Rosa Duarte, Elizabete Viana de Freitas, Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, Fábio Fernandes, Felipe Costa Fuchs, Gilson Soares Feitosa, Humberto Pierre, Ilnei Pereira, Izo Helber, Jairo Lins Borges, Jéssica Myrian de Amorim Garcia, José Antonio Gordillo de Souza, José Carlos da Costa Zanon, Josmar de Castro Alves, Kalil Lays Mohallem, Laura Mariana de Siqueira Mendonça Chaves, Lídia Ana Zytynski Moura, Márcia Cristina Amélia da Silva, Maria Alice de Vilhena Toledo, Maria Elisa Lucena Sales de Melo Assunção, Mauricio Wajngarten, Mauro José Oliveira Gonçalves, Neuza Helena Moreira Lopes, Nezilour Lobato Rodrigues, Paulo Roberto Pereira Toscano, Pedro Rousseff, Ricardo Antonio Rosado Maia, Roberto Alexandre Franken, Roberto Dischinger Miranda, Roberto Gamarski, Ronaldo Fernandes Rosa, Silvio Carlos de Moraes Santos, Siulmara Cristina Galera, Stela Maris da Silva Grespan, Teresa Cristina Rogerio da Silva, William Antonio de Magalhães Esteves

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 19%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 10 5%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 63 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 73 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#524
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,677
of 366,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.