You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Señales de amenaza y sesgo atencional en lafobia a la sangre, inyecciones y heridasy en la fobia a las serpientes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anales de Psicología, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.6018/analesps.484051 |
| Authors |
Juan Pedro Sánchez-Navarro, José M. Martínez-Selva, Vladimir Kosonogov, Eduvigis Carrillo-Verdejo, Sara Pineda, Ginesa Torrente |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,609,710
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Anales de Psicología
#9
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,160
of 436,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales de Psicología
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them