↓ Skip to main content

Enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcomes in general critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcomes in general critically ill patients
Published in
Clinics, January 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(02)oa09
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Antonio Silva, Saionara da Graça Freitas dos Santos, Cristiane Damiani Tomasi, Gabrielle da Luz, Marcos Marques da Silva Paula, Felipe Dal Pizzol, Cristiane Ritter

Abstract

To determine the relationship between enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcome in general critically ill patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,001
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,406
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#37
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.