↓ Skip to main content

Acoustic analyses of diadochokinesis in fluent and stuttering children

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acoustic analyses of diadochokinesis in fluent and stuttering children
Published in
Clinics, May 2012
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)01
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabiola Staróbole Juste, Silmara Rondon, Fernanda Chiarion Sassi, Ana Paula Ritto, Claudia Aparecida Colalto, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to acoustically compare the performance of children who do and do not stutter on diadochokinesis tasks in terms of syllable duration, syllable periods, and peak intensity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 23 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Linguistics 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#327
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,406
of 175,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.