↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses
Published in
Clinics, May 2012
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)06
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Anton, Filomena Marino Carvalho, Elci Isabel Oliveira, Gustavo ArantesRosaMaciel, Edmund Chada Baracat, Jesus Paula Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 34 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,240,498
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#195
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,757
of 175,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.