↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in female breast cancer mortality rates in Brazil between 1980 and 2009

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disparities in female breast cancer mortality rates in Brazil between 1980 and 2009
Published in
Clinics, July 2012
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)05
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruffo Freitas-Junior, Carolina Maciel Reis Gonzaga, Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas, Edesio Martins, Rita de Cássia de Maio Dardes

Abstract

To describe the temporal trends in female breast cancer mortality rates in Brazil in its macro-regions and states between 1980 and 2009.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,690
of 176,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.