You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diaphragmatic pacing stimulation in spinal cord injury: anesthetic and perioperative management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2012(11)07 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miguel L. Tedde, Paulo Vasconcelos Filho, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida, Gustavo Fagundes Flora, Erica Mie Okumura, Eduardo A. Osawa, Julia Tizue Fukushima, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes Galas, Fabio Biscegli Jatene, José Otávio Costa Auler |
| Abstract |
The standard therapy for patients with high-level spinal cord injury is long-term mechanical ventilation through a tracheostomy. However, in some cases, this approach results in death or disability. The aim of this study is to highlight the anesthetics and perioperative aspects of patients undergoing insertion of a diaphragmatic pacemaker. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#310
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,775
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#22
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.