You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new cultural adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2013(01)oa10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Aurélio Fornazieri, Richard L Doty, Clayson Alan dos Santos, Fábio de Rezende Pinna, Thiago Freire Pinto Bezerra, Richard Louis Voegels |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 41% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#543
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,617
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.