↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the diagnostic values of circulating microRNAs and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the diagnostic values of circulating microRNAs and cardiac troponin T in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Clinics, January 2013
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(01)oa12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying-Qing Li, Mei-Fen Zhang, Hong-Yan Wen, Chun-Lin Hu, Rong Liu, Hong-Yan Wei, Chen-Mu Ai, Gang Wang, Xiao-Xing Liao, Xin Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Other 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 15%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#326
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,366
of 289,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.