You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of performance and age of the fastest 100-mile ultra-marathoners worldwide
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2013(05)05 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christoph Alexander Rüst, Beat Knechtle, Thomas Rosemann, Romuald Lepers |
Abstract |
The performance and age of peak ultra-endurance performance have been investigated in single races and single race series but not using worldwide participation data. The purpose of this study was to examine the changes in running performance and the age of peak running performance of the best 100-mile ultra-marathoners worldwide. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Professor | 7 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 25 | 42% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#627
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,978
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.