↓ Skip to main content

Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is painless synovitis different from painful synovitis? A controlled, ultrasound, radiographic, clinical trial
Published in
Clinics, February 2014
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2014(02)04
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Freitas Pereira, Jamil Natour, Ana Leticia Pirozzi de Buosi, Fernando Bernardes Maia Diniz Ferreira, Artur da Rocha Corrêa Fernandes, Rita Nely Vilar Furtado

Abstract

This study compares the clinical, ultrasonography, radiography, and laboratory outcomes of painless and painful chronic synovitis in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Psychology 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2014.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#824
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,272
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.