↓ Skip to main content

The five-point Likert scale for dyspnea can properly assess the degree of pulmonary congestion and predict adverse events in heart failure outpatients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The five-point Likert scale for dyspnea can properly assess the degree of pulmonary congestion and predict adverse events in heart failure outpatients
Published in
Clinics, May 2014
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)08
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina K Weber, Marcelo H Miglioranza, Maria A P de Moraes, Roberto T Sant'anna, Marciane M Rover, Renato A K Kalil, Tiago Luiz L Leiria

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,747,984
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#244
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,872
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.