↓ Skip to main content

Red blood cell distribution width is associated with myocardial injury in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Red blood cell distribution width is associated with myocardial injury in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Clinics, January 2015
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2015(01)04
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erhan Tenekecioglu, Mustafa Yilmaz, Osman Can Yontar, Adem Bekler, Tezcan Peker, Kemal Karaagac, Ozlem Arican Ozluk, Fahriye Vatansever Agca, Mustafa Kuzeytemiz, Muhammed Senturk, Burhan Aslan, Dursun Topal

Abstract

The red blood cell distribution width has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. In the present study, we assessed the relationship between red cell distribution width values and cardiac troponin I levels in patients admitted with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#571
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,899
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.