↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and epidemiological differences between septic arthritis of the knee and hip caused by oxacillin-sensitive and -resistant s. aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and epidemiological differences between septic arthritis of the knee and hip caused by oxacillin-sensitive and -resistant s. aureus
Published in
Clinics, January 2015
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2015(01)06
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilo Partezani Helito, Bruno Bonganha Zanon, Helder de Souza Miyahara, Jose Ricardo Pecora, Ana Lucia Munhoz Lima, Priscila Rosalba de Oliveira, Jose Ricardo Negreiros de Vicente, Marco Kawamura Demange, Gilberto Luis Camanho

Abstract

To establish the risk factors for joint infection by oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) using clinical and epidemiological data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#861
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,644
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.