↓ Skip to main content

The effects of motor adaptation on ankle isokinetic assessments in older drivers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of motor adaptation on ankle isokinetic assessments in older drivers
Published in
Clinics, July 2018
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2018/e303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelica Castilho Alonso, Guilherme Carlos Brech, Rita de Cássia Ernandes, Douglas Rodrigues, Sérgio Ayama, Alexandra Carolina Canonica, Natália Mariana Silva Luna, Sileno da Silva Santos, Luis Mochizuki, Mark Peterson, Luiz Eugênio Garcez-Leme, Júlia Maria D’Andréa Greve

Abstract

This study sought to analyze the extent of motor adaptation in ankle plantar flexors and dorsiflexors among older drivers during clinical isokinetic testing. One hundred older adults (70.4±5.7 years) participated in two bilateral ankle plantar flexor and dorsiflexor isokinetic assessments at 30°/sec. Peak torque (PTQ), PTQ adjusted for body weight (PTQ/BW), and total work (TW) were analyzed. On the dominant side, PTQ/BW and TW were significantly greater for the second plantar flexion test than were those for the first such test (p<0.001), whereas PTQ, PTQ/BW, and TW (p<0.001) were significantly greater for the second dorsiflexion test than were those for the first such test. On the non-dominant side, plantar flexion PTQ and TW were significantly lower for the second test than were those for the first test (p<0.001). Older drivers demonstrated better performance with the dominant limb on the second test. The low variability in test execution showed the existence of a motor adaptation effect for the tested movements, despite the short recovery period between the assessments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 10 48%