You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brazilian Guidelines for Hereditary Angioedema Management - 2017 Update Part 1: Definition, Classification and Diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2018/e310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Giavina-Bianchi, Luisa Karla Arruda, Marcelo V. Aun, Regis A. Campos, Herberto J. Chong-Neto, Rosemeire N. Constantino-Silva, Fátima R. Fernandes, Maria F. Ferraro, Mariana P.L. Ferriani, Alfeu T. França, Gustavo Fusaro, Juliana F.B. Garcia, Shirley Komninakis, Luana S.M. Maia, Eli Mansour, Adriana S. Moreno, Antonio A. Motta, João B. Pesquero, Nathalia Portilho, Nelson A. Rosário, Faradiba S. Serpa, Dirceu Solé, Priscila Takejima, Eliana Toledo, Solange O.R. Valle, Camila L. Veronez, Anete S. Grumach |
| Abstract |
Hereditary angioedema is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by recurrent angioedema attacks with the involvement of multiple organs. The disease is unknown to many health professionals and is therefore underdiagnosed. Patients who are not adequately diagnosed and treated have an estimated mortality rate ranging from 25% to 40% due to asphyxiation by laryngeal angioedema. Intestinal angioedema is another important and incapacitating presentation that may be the main or only manifestation during an attack. In this article, a group of experts from the "Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI)" and the "Grupo de Estudos Brasileiro em Angioedema Hereditário (GEBRAEH)" has updated the Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,782,070
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#294
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,424
of 338,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.