↓ Skip to main content

Does whole-body electrical muscle stimulation combined with strength training promote morphofunctional alterations?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does whole-body electrical muscle stimulation combined with strength training promote morphofunctional alterations?
Published in
Clinics, November 2019
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Lopes Evangelista, Cauê Vazquez La Scala Teixeira, Bruna Massaroto Barros, Jônatas Bezerra de Azevedo, Marcos Rodolfo Ramos Paunksnis, Cleison Rodrigues de Souza, Tanuj Wadhi, Roberta Luksevicius Rica, Tiago Volpi Braz, Danilo Sales Bocalini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 40 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 46 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,276,838
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#124
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,577
of 381,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.