↓ Skip to main content

Improvement in muscular strength and aerobic capacities in elderly people occurs independently of physical training type or exercise model

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvement in muscular strength and aerobic capacities in elderly people occurs independently of physical training type or exercise model
Published in
Clinics, June 2019
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2019/e833
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mari L Sbardelotto, Rochelle R Costa, Karine A Malysz, Giulia S Pedroso, Bárbara C Pereira, Helen R Sorato, Paulo C L Silveira, Renata T Nesi, Antônio J Grande, Ricardo A Pinho

Abstract

Progressive decline of physiological processes with aging is normal. Aging is also associated with decreased functional capacity and onset of many diseases. This study evaluated the changes in physical fitness (PF), body composition (BC), and lipid profile (LP) in elderly men completing different training protocols. Fifty-five men (age 60-80 years) were randomized into the following groups: without training, aerobic training on dry land, combined training on dry land, and combined training in water. Training was conducted for 8 weeks, and PF, LP, and BC were assessed at the beginning and end of the intervention. Significant improvements were observed in all parameters; however, combined programs on land or in water were more effective at improving strength and aerobic fitness. Combined exercise produced greater effects on BC and LP and some muscle fitness parameters; however, improvements in muscular and aerobic capacities occurred independently of exercise type or model. These results indicate that the effects of training occur regardless of training type or model, and are directly associated with training periodization, adherence, and regularity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Researcher 8 5%
Lecturer 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 76 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 31 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 86 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#1,001
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,030
of 365,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.