You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert recommendations for the care of newborns of mothers with COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Werther Brunow de Carvalho, Maria Augusta Bento Cicaroni Gibelli, Vera Lucia Jornada Krebs, Valdenise Martins Laurindo Tuma Calil, Cíntia Johnston |
| Abstract |
This article presents expert recommendations for assisting newborn children of mothers with suspected or diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 </mac_aq>(COVID-19). The consensus was developed by five experts with an average of 20 years of experience in neonatal intensive care working at a reference university hospital in Brazil for the care of pregnant women and newborns with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Despite the lack of scientific evidence regarding the potential for viral transmission to their fetus in pregnant mothers diagnosed with or suspected of COVID-19, it is important to elaborate the lines of care by specialists from hospitals caring for suspected and confirmed COVID-19 cases to guide multidisciplinary teams and families diagnosed with the disease or involved in the care of pregnant women and newborns in this context. Multidisciplinary teams must be attentive to the signs and symptoms of COVID-19 so that decision-making is oriented and assertive for the management of the mother and newborn in both the hospital setting and at hospital discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 80 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,569,776
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#57
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,927
of 421,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.