| Title |
Preliminary results of a clinical study to evaluate the performance and safety of swallowing in critical patients with COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maíra Santilli de Lima, Fernanda Chiarion Sassi, Gisele C. Medeiros, Ana Paula Ritto, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Ireland | 2 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 62 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,130,653
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#150
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,922
of 433,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.