↓ Skip to main content

Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA): indications, functional results, and comparison with reconstructive surgery of the ear

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA): indications, functional results, and comparison with reconstructive surgery of the ear
Published in
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, December 2013
DOI 10.7162/s1809-97772012000300017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Ferreira Bento, Alessandra Kiesewetter, Liliane Satomi Ikari, Rubens Brito

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 28%
Student > Bachelor 7 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Engineering 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,221,246
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#58
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,127
of 307,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
#8
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.