You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus SEO-SEFH of recommendations for use and compounding of ophthalmic preparations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Farmacia Hospitalaria, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.7399/fh.10943 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel Fuentes-Irigoyen, Ana María Martín de Rosales Cabrera, Ana Cristina Riestra, María Nieves Vila, Carmela Dávila-Pousa, José María Alonso Herreros, Carmen López-Cabezas, Carmen Cañete, María Sagrario Pernía-López, Marta Garcia-Palomo, Pedro Arriola Villalobos, Lucía Ibares-Frías, José Luís Urcelay Segura, Jacobo Ramón Yañez Martínez |
| Abstract |
There are many medicinal products that, although having shown efficacy and safety in different ophthalmological indications, they are not authorized or commercially available for ophthalmic administration. This implies, on one hand, that they must be used according to legislation that regulates the availability of medicines in special situations and, on the other hand, that they must be prepared in the pharmacy services for ophthalmic administration, according to quality criteria to ensure its effectiveness, stability and sterility. This document gathers the consensus between the Spanish Society of Ophthalmology and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy about these selected preparations which have shown enough evidence in their efficacy and safety for their ophthalmic use (off label) and ophthalmic administration. This document includes recommendations about its use according to the current legislation. In addition, with the aim of harmonizing the preparation of intraocular injections in the hospital pharmacy services, general recommendations are set in this document to ensure the compliance with standards established in the Spanish Guideline for Good Preparation Practices of Medicinal Products in Hospital Pharmacies. These recommendations include sections such as the area of preparation, material, technique, packaging, stability, quality control, prescription and traceability of intraocular preparations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 55% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,244,499
of 25,401,784 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#40
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,642
of 344,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.