You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of a methodology to assess patient reported outcomes in lung cancer patients: The PeOpLe (Patient-reported Outcomes in Lung cancer) study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Farmacia Hospitalaria, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.7399/fh.11835 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Villanueva-Bueno, Roberto Collado-Borrell, José Luis Revuelta-Herrero, Ana Beatriz Fernández-Román, Gema Casado-Abad, Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana, PeOple study team |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this article is to describe the PeOpLe study protocol, developed to assess patient-reported health outcomes in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice using the methodology provided by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement tool. The study envisaged will be multicenter, longitudinal, ambispective and observational. Two groups will be compared: a control group (followed up according to standard clinical practice) and an experimental group (followed up using the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement methodology adapted to the Spanish setting for 6 months). The variables collected will be related to demography (age, sex, degree of family support), clinical factors (smoking, comorbidities, lung capacity), the neoplasm (histology, staging, mutations), pharmacotherapy (treatment schedule, modifications, and complications), health status (functional status, quality of life, satisfaction and overall survival) and resource consumption (emergency visits, hospital admissions and time spent by health providers). The PeOpLe study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Research into Medicinal Products of the Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital and will be conducted in compliance with prevailing ethical principles and standards. The PeOpLe study will explore how patient-reported outcomes collection can be developed and integrated with the clinical processes used in the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer what patient-reported outcomes can be measured with systems that can conveniently be used both by patients and by healthcare providers. Systematic evaluation of patient-reported outcomes will help determine their impact in terms of effectiveness (survival), safety (complications of systemic therapy), and quality of life and patient satisfaction. The multidisciplinary and multicenter nature of the study will facilitate a comprehensive view of the subject analyzed and allow external reproducibility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Librarian | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,551,100
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#120
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,832
of 443,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Farmacia Hospitalaria
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them