↓ Skip to main content

Tick-borne rickettsioses in the Americas: clinical and epidemiological advances, and diagnostic challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Biomédica, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tick-borne rickettsioses in the Americas: clinical and epidemiological advances, and diagnostic challenges
Published in
Biomédica, September 2012
DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v33i0.1466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marylin Hidalgo, Álvaro A Faccini-Martínez, Gustavo Valbuena

Abstract

Rickettsioses are a group of zoonotic diseases caused by strict intracellular bacteria of the genus Rickettsia and Orientia which belong to the Rickettsiaceae family. Their ecology is influenced by environmental factors and the presence of specific vectors that determine the establishment and epidemiology in different world regions. In America, during the 20 th century, only three of these diseases were recognized: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, epidemic typhus and endemic typhus. However, since 2000, more than 10 different species that had previously been unknown in this continent have been described, both in arthropods and in clinical cases, fact that classifies them as emerging and re-emerging diseases. Given the clinical manifestations of the diseases caused by rickettsias, being the majority unspecific and, therefore, shared with other infectious diseases, especially viral and bacterial, they have been framed within the differential diagnoses of acute febrile syndrome in urban and tropical areas. Nowadays, there are direct and indirect diagnostic methods, which are useful in the definition of the infectious agent, in this case, the cause of rickettsioses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biomédica
#752
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,488
of 187,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomédica
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.