↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus I and II in Colombian blood donors, 2001-2014: Implications for transfusion safety

Overview of attention for article published in Biomédica, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus I and II in Colombian blood donors, 2001-2014: Implications for transfusion safety
Published in
Biomédica, May 2016
DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v36i0.2943
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Isabel Bermúdez-Forero, Maritza Berrío-Pérez, Andrea Magally Herrera-Hernández, Magda Juliana Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Sandra García-Blanco, Guillermo Orjuela-Falla, Mauricio Beltrán

Abstract

The human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) 1 and 2 cause various clinical disorders associated with degenerative diseases. Blood transfusion is a primary mechanism of transmission that is associated with the use of cellular components such as red blood cells. Objective: To describe the epidemiology of HTLV 1 and 2 in blood donors in Colombia from 2001-2014. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using screening, reactivity and positivity for HTLV 1 and 2 data collected from 2001 to 2014 by Colombian blood banks and consolidated by the Instituto Nacional de Salud. Using this information, transfusion-associated infectivity was also estimated. Results: From 2001 to 2014, 60.2% of blood collected in Colombia was screened for HTLV 1 and 2 and had a cumulative reactivity of 0.30%. This was 20 times higher in Chocó (6.28%), where blood collection ended in 2004. Blood screening for HTLV reached 94.9% in 2014 with a positive concordance of 14.7%, and an estimated 406 unscreened, potentially infectious blood units were released. The majority of the unscreened blood units (215 units, 53%) came from Antioquia, a non-endemic department. Conclusion: These results suggest that HTLV 1 and 2 infections are distributed in different areas of the country that were not previously classified as endemic. These findings support the importance of the universal screening of blood units to minimize the risk of infection through transfusion for this event.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biomédica
#553
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,518
of 312,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomédica
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.