↓ Skip to main content

Partial inhibition of two genes that encode spliceosomal proteins in Giardia intestinalis

Overview of attention for article published in Biomédica, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partial inhibition of two genes that encode spliceosomal proteins in Giardia intestinalis
Published in
Biomédica, March 2016
DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v36i0.3068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Gómez, Moisés Wasserman

Abstract

Giardia intestinalis is an early divergent organism that was recently shown to have introns. The machinery responsible for the removal of introns in higher eukaryotes is the spliceosome, which consists of five ribonucleoproteins. Each of these ribonucleoproteins has a small nuclear RNA, a set of seven Sm proteins (B, D1, D2, D3, E, F and G) and several specific proteins. Some genes that encode spliceosome proteins have been bioinformatically identified in the parasite genome. Although it is assumed that the spliceosome is responsible for splicing in this parasite, biochemical characterization is lacking. Objective. To inhibit two G. intestinalis spliceosome protein genes in order to determine whether this inhibition affects parasite growth or encystation. Materials and methods. Antisense sequences of the genes encoding the spliceosomal parasite proteins SmB and SmD3 were cloned into a specific G. intestinalis vector. G. intestinalis individuals were subsequently transfected with the recombinant vectors and those parasites that incorporated the vector were selected. A decrease in mRNA levels by real-time PCR was confirmed and the growth and encystation in wild and transfected parasites was assessed. Results. A decrease of 40% and 70% of SmB and SmD3 mRNA levels, respectively, was observed. Growth and encystation in these parasites were not affected. Conclusion. Decrease of SmB and SmD3 mRNA levels does not affect the parasite, indicating that the spliceosome remains functional or that splicing is not essential for parasite viability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,986,161
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biomédica
#476
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,479
of 315,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomédica
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.