↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and six-month follow-up on a cohort of newborns with congenital syphilis

Overview of attention for article published in Biomédica, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization and six-month follow-up on a cohort of newborns with congenital syphilis
Published in
Biomédica, August 2015
DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v36i1.2661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristian Vallejo, Yolanda Cifuentes

Abstract

Congenital syphilis is a preventable disease. However, the incidence in Colombia has increased and reached the figure of 3.28 cases per 1,000 live births in 2011.  To characterize newborns with congenital syphilis and describe follow-up over 6 months following their diagnosis and treatment.  Between August, 2011, and February, 2012, in Hospital La Victoria, sede Instituto Materno Infantil, newborns with congenital syphilis were identified and treated. Clinical and laboratory follow-up was carried out for six months until it was determined that the disease was cured. The analyzed variables included patients' clinical and laboratory characteristics.  In this period, we identified 29 cases that met the criteria of congenital syphilis, with a frequency in the institution of one case per 69 births. There was one stillbirth and one neonatal death, four were premature, and five had growth restriction. Of the 28 live births, 15 were asymptomatic. There were two cases with neurosyphilis, representing 15% of symptomatic newborns. Follow-up was done on 18 out of 27 children (66.6%), including most symptomatic cases and the two cases of neurosyphilis. All cases showed the expected decrease in VDRL titers without clinical sequelae, meeting the criteria of being cured.  A high incidence of the disease, failure to prevent it, varied expression in its presentation, and the effectiveness of treatment in the neonatal period were evidenced in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 21%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#14,280,554
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Biomédica
#341
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,228
of 278,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomédica
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.