↓ Skip to main content

Effects of General-epidural Anaesthesia on Haemodynamics in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis.

Overview of attention for article published in West Indian Medical Journal, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of General-epidural Anaesthesia on Haemodynamics in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis.
Published in
West Indian Medical Journal, March 2015
DOI 10.7727/wimj.2013.054
Pubmed ID
Authors

X-Z Liu, C-W Wei, H-Y Wang, Y-H Ge, J Chen, J Wang, Y Zhang

Abstract

The current study aims to explore the effects of general-epidural anaesthesia (GEA) on the perioperative haemodynamics in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), as well as their extubation time. A total of 42 MG patients (Ossermann I-II b types) receiving elective total thymectomy were randomized into GEA (n = 20) and general anaesthesia alone (GA; n = 22) groups. Changes in their mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anesthesia and at the time of intubation, skin incision, sternotomy and extubation. Dosages of general anaesthetics during time unit and the time of extubation and complete recovery from the ending of the operation were also recorded. After anaesthesia, both groups displayed increased MAPs and HRs, with those in the GA group significantly higher than those in the GEA group (p < 0.05). The total consumption of general anaesthetics in the GA group was markedly higher than that in the GEA group (p < 0.01). The GEA group had shorter postoperative extubation and recovery time than the GA group (p < 0.01). General-epidural anaesthesia stabilizes perioperative haemodynamics, reduces the consumption of general anaesthetics and shortens extubation time. It is a feasible and ideal anaesthetic method at present.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%