↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasonographic evaluation of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Overview of attention for article published in West Indian Medical Journal, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasonographic evaluation of femoral cartilage thickness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Published in
West Indian Medical Journal, February 2014
DOI 10.7727/wimj.2013.221
Pubmed ID
Authors

I Batmaz, M Kara, T Tiftik, E Çapkin, M Karkucak, Ö F Serdar, F Kartal, M A Sariyildiz, L Özçakar

Abstract

To evaluate femoral cartilage thickness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) by using ultrasonography. Eighty-four patients (55 M, 29 F) with a diagnosis of AS and 84 age-, gender- and body mass index-matched healthy subjects were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients including disease duration, morning stiffness and medications were recorded. The femoral cartilage thicknesses of both knees were measured with a 7-12 MHz linear probe while subjects' knees were held in maximum flexion. Three mid-point measurements were taken from both knees (lateral femoral condyle (LFC), intercondylar area (ICA) and medial femoral condyle (MFC)). Concerning both ICA (p < 0.001) and left MFC (p = 0.013), cartilage measurements were significantly thicker in AS patients than control subjects. In a subgroup analysis (anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) users vs anti-TNF naive), cartilage thickness measurements - bilateral ICA (p = 0.000) and left MFC (p = 0.017) - were found to be greater in AS patients under anti-TNF treatment (n = 65) when compared with those of healthy controls. We imply that AS patients seem to have thicker femoral cartilage, which could be related to anti-TNF treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Other 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 69%
Unspecified 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%