↓ Skip to main content

Subcortical volumes across the lifespan: Data from 18,605 healthy individuals aged 3–90 years

Overview of attention for article published in Human Brain Mapping, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Subcortical volumes across the lifespan: Data from 18,605 healthy individuals aged 3–90 years
Published in
Human Brain Mapping, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/hbm.25320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danai Dima, Amirhossein Modabbernia, Efstathios Papachristou, Gaelle E. Doucet, Ingrid Agartz, Moji Aghajani, Theophilus N. Akudjedu, Anton Albajes‐Eizagirre, Dag Alnæs, Kathryn I. Alpert, Micael Andersson, Nancy C. Andreasen, Ole A. Andreassen, Philip Asherson, Tobias Banaschewski, Nuria Bargallo, Sarah Baumeister, Ramona Baur‐Streubel, Alessandro Bertolino, Aurora Bonvino, Dorret I. Boomsma, Stefan Borgwardt, Josiane Bourque, Daniel Brandeis, Alan Breier, Henry Brodaty, Rachel M. Brouwer, Jan K. Buitelaar, Geraldo F. Busatto, Randy L. Buckner, Vincent Calhoun, Erick J. Canales‐Rodríguez, Dara M. Cannon, Xavier Caseras, Francisco X. Castellanos, Simon Cervenka, Tiffany M. Chaim‐Avancini, Christopher R. K. Ching, Victoria Chubar, Vincent P. Clark, Patricia Conrod, Annette Conzelmann, Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro, Fabrice Crivello, Eveline A. Crone, Udo Dannlowski, Anders M. Dale, Christopher Davey, Eco J. C. de Geus, Lieuwe de Haan, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Anouk den Braber, Erin W. Dickie, Annabella Di Giorgio, Nhat Trung Doan, Erlend S. Dørum, Stefan Ehrlich, Susanne Erk, Thomas Espeseth, Helena Fatouros‐Bergman, Simon E. Fisher, Jean‐Paul Fouche, Barbara Franke, Thomas Frodl, Paola Fuentes‐Claramonte, David C. Glahn, Ian H. Gotlib, Hans‐Jörgen Grabe, Oliver Grimm, Nynke A. Groenewold, Dominik Grotegerd, Oliver Gruber, Patricia Gruner, Rachel E. Gur, Ruben C. Gur, Tim Hahn, Ben J. Harrison, Catharine A. Hartman, Sean N. Hatton, Andreas Heinz, Dirk J. Heslenfeld, Derrek P. Hibar, Ian B. Hickie, Beng‐Choon Ho, Pieter J. Hoekstra, Sarah Hohmann, Avram J. Holmes, Martine Hoogman, Norbert Hosten, Fleur M. Howells, Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol, Chaim Huyser, Neda Jahanshad, Anthony James, Terry L. Jernigan, Jiyang Jiang, Erik G. Jönsson, John A. Joska, Rene Kahn, Andrew Kalnin, Ryota Kanai, Marieke Klein, Tatyana P. Klyushnik, Laura Koenders, Sanne Koops, Bernd Krämer, Jonna Kuntsi, Jim Lagopoulos, Luisa Lázaro, Irina Lebedeva, Won Hee Lee, Klaus‐Peter Lesch, Christine Lochner, Marise W. J. Machielsen, Sophie Maingault, Nicholas G. Martin, Ignacio Martínez‐Zalacaín, David Mataix‐Cols, Bernard Mazoyer, Colm McDonald, Brenna C. McDonald, Andrew M. McIntosh, Katie L. McMahon, Genevieve McPhilemy, Susanne Meinert, José M. Menchón, Sarah E. Medland, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Jilly Naaijen, Pablo Najt, Tomohiro Nakao, Jan E. Nordvik, Lars Nyberg, Jaap Oosterlaan, Víctor Ortiz‐García de la Foz, Yannis Paloyelis, Paul Pauli, Giulio Pergola, Edith Pomarol‐Clotet, Maria J. Portella, Steven G. Potkin, Joaquim Radua, Andreas Reif, Daniel A. Rinker, Joshua L. Roffman, Pedro G. P. Rosa, Matthew D. Sacchet, Perminder S. Sachdev, Raymond Salvador, Pascual Sánchez‐Juan, Salvador Sarró, Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Andrew J. Saykin, Mauricio H. Serpa, Lianne Schmaal, Knut Schnell, Gunter Schumann, Kang Sim, Jordan W. Smoller, Iris Sommer, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Dan J. Stein, Lachlan T. Strike, Suzanne C. Swagerman, Christian K. Tamnes, Henk S. Temmingh, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Alexander S. Tomyshev, Diana Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez, Julian N. Trollor, Jessica A. Turner, Anne Uhlmann, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Dennis van den Meer, Nic J. A. van der Wee, Neeltje E. M. van Haren, Dennis van't Ent, Theo G. M. van Erp, Ilya M. Veer, Dick J. Veltman, Aristotle Voineskos, Henry Völzke, Henrik Walter, Esther Walton, Lei Wang, Yang Wang, Thomas H. Wassink, Bernd Weber, Wei Wen, John D. West, Lars T. Westlye, Heather Whalley, Lara M. Wierenga, Steven C. R. Williams, Katharina Wittfeld, Daniel H. Wolf, Amanda Worker, Margaret J. Wright, Kun Yang, Yulyia Yoncheva, Marcus V. Zanetti, Georg C. Ziegler, Paul M. Thompson, Sophia Frangou, Karolinska Schizophrenia Project

Abstract

Age has a major effect on brain volume. However, the normative studies available are constrained by small sample sizes, restricted age coverage and significant methodological variability. These limitations introduce inconsistencies and may obscure or distort the lifespan trajectories of brain morphometry. In response, we capitalized on the resources of the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium to examine age-related trajectories inferred from cross-sectional measures of the ventricles, the basal ganglia (caudate, putamen, pallidum, and nucleus accumbens), the thalamus, hippocampus and amygdala using magnetic resonance imaging data obtained from 18,605 individuals aged 3-90 years. All subcortical structure volumes were at their maximum value early in life. The volume of the basal ganglia showed a monotonic negative association with age thereafter; there was no significant association between age and the volumes of the thalamus, amygdala and the hippocampus (with some degree of decline in thalamus) until the sixth decade of life after which they also showed a steep negative association with age. The lateral ventricles showed continuous enlargement throughout the lifespan. Age was positively associated with inter-individual variability in the hippocampus and amygdala and the lateral ventricles. These results were robust to potential confounders and could be used to examine the functional significance of deviations from typical age-related morphometric patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 268 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Student > Master 14 5%
Student > Bachelor 12 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 125 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 37 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 10%
Psychology 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 141 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,703,232
of 34,355,701 outputs
Outputs from Human Brain Mapping
#295
of 4,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,643
of 583,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Brain Mapping
#7
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,355,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 583,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.