↓ Skip to main content

Book reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Records of Australian Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 172)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Book reviews
Published in
Historical Records of Australian Science, January 2021
DOI 10.1071/hr21902
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#10,180,219
of 34,265,936 outputs
Outputs from Historical Records of Australian Science
#23
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,936
of 573,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Records of Australian Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,265,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 573,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.