| Title |
Theorising in urban and regional studies: negotiating generalisation and particularity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cjres/rsaa036 |
| Authors |
Kevin R Cox, Emil Evenhuis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Poland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 58% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,820,334
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society
#152
of 369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,313
of 519,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.