↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Design 1 6%
Unknown 11 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,092,870
of 28,086,468 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#121,302
of 243,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,698
of 544,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,207
of 2,863 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,086,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 544,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,863 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.