↓ Skip to main content

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Family Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Gerontologist, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
658 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Family Caregivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Gerontologist, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/geront/gns126
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Caring for a family member with dementia is associated with chronic stress, which can have significant deleterious effects on caregivers. The purpose of the Balance Study was to compare a mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) intervention to a community caregiver education and support (CCES) intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 658 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 643 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 74 11%
Student > Bachelor 56 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 7%
Other 151 23%
Unknown 143 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 159 24%
Psychology 158 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 10%
Social Sciences 51 8%
Neuroscience 12 2%
Other 51 8%
Unknown 159 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,521,664
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Gerontologist
#495
of 3,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,373
of 230,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gerontologist
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.