↓ Skip to main content

Chlamydiae Has Contributed at Least 55 Genes to Plantae with Predominantly Plastid Functions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chlamydiae Has Contributed at Least 55 Genes to Plantae with Predominantly Plastid Functions
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002205
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The photosynthetic organelle (plastid) originated via primary endosymbiosis in which a phagotrophic protist captured and harnessed a cyanobacterium. The plastid was inherited by the common ancestor of the red, green (including land plants), and glaucophyte algae (together, the Plantae). Despite the critical importance of primary plastid endosymbiosis, its ancient derivation has left behind very few "footprints" of early key events in organelle genesis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 4 4%
France 2 2%
Egypt 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 79 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#6,497,660
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,342
of 224,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,405
of 137,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#195
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.