↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Chair Stand Strategy and Mobility Limitations in Older Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Association Between Chair Stand Strategy and Mobility Limitations in Older Adults With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.026
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine which lower limb strength and joint kinetic and kinematic parameters distinguish sit-to-stand (STS) performance of older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) with higher and lower chair stand time.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Engineering 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2013.
All research outputs
#22,980,811
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#5,714
of 7,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,833
of 229,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#69
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.