↓ Skip to main content

Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Research in Science Teaching, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science
Published in
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, December 1999
DOI 10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::aid-tea2>3.0.co;2-i
Authors

Carolyn W. Keys, Brian Hand, Vaughn Prain, Susan Collins

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 203 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 21%
Student > Master 26 12%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Professor 13 6%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 50 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 85 40%
Chemistry 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 56 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Research in Science Teaching
#1,049
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,741
of 108,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Research in Science Teaching
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.