↓ Skip to main content

Indoxiphia prima (Hymenoptera, Xiphydriidae): Discovery of a Taiwanese Woodwasp in Southern Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indoxiphia prima (Hymenoptera, Xiphydriidae): Discovery of a Taiwanese Woodwasp in Southern Japan
Published in
Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology, February 2021
DOI 10.50826/bnmnszool.47.1_1
Authors

Akihiko Shinohara, David R. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology
#9
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,992
of 526,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A, Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.3. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them