You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61379-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio Lasalvia, Silvia Zoppei, Tine Van Bortel, Chiara Bonetto, Doriana Cristofalo, Kristian Wahlbeck, Simon Vasseur Bacle, Chantal Van Audenhove, Jaap van Weeghel, Blanca Reneses, Arunas Germanavicius, Marina Economou, Mariangela Lanfredi, Shuntaro Ando, Norman Sartorius, Juan J Lopez-Ibor, Graham Thornicroft, the ASPEN/INDIGO Study Group |
| Abstract |
Depression is the third leading contributor to the worldwide burden of disease. We assessed the nature and severity of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by adults with major depressive disorder worldwide. Moreover, we investigated whether experienced discrimination is related to clinical history, provision of health care, and disclosure of diagnosis and whether anticipated discrimination is associated with disclosure and previous experiences of discrimination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 20% |
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| Australia | 9 | 6% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| Ireland | 8 | 5% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 71 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 12% |
| Scientists | 15 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 465 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 455 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 15% |
| Researcher | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 102 | 22% |
| Unknown | 81 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 115 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 106 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#138,647
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,813
of 43,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#634
of 194,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#11
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.