↓ Skip to main content

The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, July 2011
DOI 10.1097/jcn.0b013e318213efcf
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) today is responsible for approximately one-third of deaths worldwide, and that figure will surely increase in both developing and developed countries as risk factors for the disease-primarily dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, physical inactivity, poor diet, and smoking-continue to increase. Although these risk factors are modifiable, to date there is a relative paucity of measures to prevent or control them, particularly in developing countries. A population strategy combined with a high-risk strategy for CVD prevention could greatly reduce the burden of disease in the coming decades. Many initiatives are working, but many more are needed. This chapter provides background on the global burden of CVD and provides the context for the subsequent chapters addressing nurses' roles in reversing the bleak predictions for the ravages of CVD if risk factors are left unchecked in the coming decades.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Engineering 6 6%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2013.
All research outputs
#9,242,056
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#219
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,620
of 166,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.