↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic analysis of larval locomotion in Drosophila chordotonal organ mutants

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic analysis of larval locomotion in Drosophila chordotonal organ mutants
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2535546100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason C. Caldwell, Matthew M. Miller, Susan Wing, David R. Soll, Daniel F. Eberl

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 181 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 26%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 50%
Neuroscience 28 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 20 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#114,007
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,211
of 199,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#547
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.