↓ Skip to main content

Proline-rich Antimicrobial Peptides Optimized for Binding to Escherichia coli Chaperone DnaK.

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Peptide Letters, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Proline-rich Antimicrobial Peptides Optimized for Binding to Escherichia coli Chaperone DnaK.
Published in
Protein & Peptide Letters, January 2016
DOI 10.2174/0929866523666160719124712
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The bacterial protein DnaK promotes folding of newly synthesized polypeptide chains, refolding of misfolded proteins, and protein trafficking. Assisted refolding is especially important under stress conditions induced by antibiotic therapies reducing the desired bactericidal effects. DnaK is supposedly targeted by proline-rich antimicrobial peptides (PrAMPs), but Escherichia coli ΔdnaK mutants and wild type strains are equally susceptible indicating further intracellular targets, such as the 70S ribosome. Crystal structures of PrAMP-DnaK-complexes revealed forward and reverse binding modes at the substrate binding domain. Here, we used these ligand-target structures for the first time to rationally optimize peptides using molecular modeling and docking leading to predict four-residue long sequences binding stronger to DnaK. When these sequences where used to replace the original sequence stretch in Onc72, most peptides showed significantly reduced dissociation constants (Kd) determined by fluorescence polarization. In a second approach, the X-ray structures of Api88 and Onc72 bound to DnaK were examined to predict substitutions prone to stronger interactions. Among the 36 peptides obtained from both approaches, six derivatives bound to DnaK with more than 10-fold higher affinities (Kd values in the low micromolar to nanomolar range). Peptides binding stronger to DnaK showed the same minimal inhibitory concentrations against wild type E. coli as the original peptide, but were slightly less active for ΔdnaK mutants. However, one peptide was able to overcome the resistance in an E. coli mutant lacking the SbmA transporter obligatory for the uptake of PrAMPs including Api88 and Onc72. Thus, it´s tempting to speculate that DnaK might be involved in the translocation of PrAMPs into E. coli.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 25%
Chemistry 5 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#28,605,296
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Peptide Letters
#587
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,082
of 446,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Peptide Letters
#20
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.