↓ Skip to main content

埴輪土偶に基いて古代の風俗を演ぶ

Overview of attention for article published in Anthropological Science, January 1888
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 269)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
埴輪土偶に基いて古代の風俗を演ぶ
Published in
Anthropological Science, January 1888
DOI 10.1537/ase1887.3.100
Authors

坪井 正五郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Anthropological Science
#32
of 269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anthropological Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them