↓ Skip to main content

マグマ生成実験を活用したジオパークの小学校における火山教室

Overview of attention for article published in Education of Earth Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
マグマ生成実験を活用したジオパークの小学校における火山教室
Published in
Education of Earth Science, November 2019
DOI 10.18904/chigakukyoiku.71.3_57
Authors

三好 雅也, 畑中 健徳, 吉川 博輔, 藤井 純子, 馬渡 秀夫, 小林 暉, 内山田 朋弥, 山本 博文

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Education of Earth Science
#9
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,037
of 377,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Education of Earth Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.