↓ Skip to main content

Decrease of the Suwa Lake Area and Flood Damage

Overview of attention for article published in HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 134)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decrease of the Suwa Lake Area and Flood Damage
Published in
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, January 2002
DOI 10.2208/journalhs1990.22.61
Authors

Minoru KUBOTA, Masanori MOYOSHI, Yoshiaki NAKAMURA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#15
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,945
of 132,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.