You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interception of the Fukushima reactor accident‐derived137Cs, 134Cs and 131I by coniferous forest canopies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2012gl052928 |
| Authors |
Hiroaki Kato, Yuichi Onda, Takashi Gomi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#992,477
of 25,202,494 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,997
of 21,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,529
of 184,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#22
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,202,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.