| Title |
Remote primary care consultations for people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of people living with dementia and their carers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2020.1094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Remco Tuijt, Greta Rait, Rachael Frost, Jane Wilcock, Jill Manthorpe, Kate Walters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,381,522
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#665
of 4,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,491
of 424,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#17
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.