You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
β遮断薬内服患者のアドレナリン抵抗性アナフィラキシーショックにグルカゴンが有効であった一例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3918/jsicm.28_126 |
| Authors |
馬屋原 拓, 片山 智博, 松浦 一義, 井上 美奈子 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,092,958
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#36
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,344
of 453,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.